|
Previous
·
Next
|
bernd
|
Date: 11/29/2008 1:25 pm · Subject: Question concerning approval workflows · Rating: 0
On our site we have the following problem: some of our CS are moderated. For these we have generated approval workflows that ask a certain group for permission whenever a new post is submitted. We do have several groups for that in order to share the work among content managers. However, we would like to have all content managers be able to submit to moderated CS without requiring approval. Can this be done somehow? Allowing content managers to edit respective CS (or containted posts) is not sufficient. I have tried that already. Any ideas?
Bernd
--
Klettern in Magdeburg
(http://www.klettern-md.de)
--- (Edited on 29.11.2008 20:25 [GMT+0100] by bernd) ---
|
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
| |
perlDreamer
|
Date: 11/30/2008 8:03 pm · Subject: Re: Question concerning approval workflows · Rating: 1
How about making a hybrid Workflow? Something inbetween Commit with Approval, and Commit Without Approval.
When the workflow is activated, it checks to see if the user belongs to a special group that is defined for it. If the user is a member of that group, it commits right away. Otherwise, it submits the content for approval to the normal moderation group.
--- (Edited on 11/30/2008 6:03 pm [GMT-0800] by perlDreamer) ---
|
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
| |
preaction
|
Date: 12/1/2008 2:05 am · Subject: Re: Question concerning approval workflows · Rating: 1
If the Content Managers group is the Group To Approve, they don't need approval for their own content.
If you need something more flexible, I would suggest taking the current "Request Approval by Committer Group" and adding some sort of "reverse" flag to it so that anybody NOT in the group would need approval.
--- (Edited on 12/1/2008 2:05 am [GMT-0600] by preaction) ---
|
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
| |
bernd
|
Date: 12/2/2008 1:12 am · Subject: Re: Question concerning approval workflows · Rating: 0
Thanks for your replies, guys. Extending the "Request Approval by Committer Group" activity is probably the simplest solution. Would that feature by interesting for the core? Or do I get away with a quick and dirty hack?
--
Klettern in Magdeburg
(http://www.klettern-md.de)
--- (Edited on 02.12.2008 08:12 [GMT+0100] by bernd) ---
|
| Back to Top |
Rate [ | ]
|
| |
|
|
Recent Discussions Color Key |
| Design: |
|
| Development: |
|
| Et Cetera: |
|
| Install/Upgrade: |
|
| Smoketest: |
|
| Template Group: |
|
Re: Navigation links by techwriter - Fri @ 03:23pm Re: Best way to make files available to webgui comunity by bernd - Fri @ 02:50pm Re: Best way to make files available to webgui comunity by lctn2 - Fri @ 01:55pm Re: Strategic Roadmap by JT - Fri @ 01:55pm Re: Navigation links by rogier - Fri @ 01:55pm Re: 2009 Presidents Meeting by JT - Fri @ 01:10pm Re: navigation new window by rogier - Fri @ 01:03pm Re: navigation new window by rogier - Fri @ 12:53pm Re: WUC 2009 by JT - Fri @ 12:50pm Re: Best way to make files available to webgui comunity by preaction - Fri @ 12:35pm Re: Pagination markup by rogier - Fri @ 12:35pm Re: Best way to make files available to webgui comunity by kristi - Fri @ 12:29pm
|
