Hi, I'm JT and these are my thoughts on community, content management, Plain Black, and WebGUI.

Chat With JT: Releases and Stability

User: JT
Date: 9/25/2008 6:08 pm
Views: 2417
Rating: -7    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Send to a Friend

I've just uploaded a new Chat with the CEO movie about WebGUI releases and stability. This has important timing, because the WebGUI release coming out today (7.5.24) is the release you must decide whether you're an early adopter of 7.6 or not.

Let me back up a bit. For those of you that don't know how releases of WebGUI work either read on or watch the video. 

We have two versions, beta and stable. Stable releases are good for those concerned with as bug free an environment as possible. The current stable release is 7.5.24. Beta releases are used to showcase our latest features and to get input from the community about bugs in the new release before it goes stable. The first 7.6 beta release will be out next Tuesday. You can download both the beta and stable from getwebgui.com, and you can demo the beta and stable versions as well. 

We also provide shunt releases that allow you to upgrade from a stable to a beta rather than waiting for the beta to turn stable. This is for you early adopters out there. Incidentally, if you would ever consider using a beta for a new feature then you are by definition an early adopter. We typically only provide one shunt release to get you from the current stable to the new beta, and that's happening now. That shunt release to go from 7.5 to 7.6 is 7.5.24. You must make the decision before upgrading to 7.5.25, because once you've gone to 7.5.25 (or higher) you must stay on the stable release until the beta becomes stable.

The beta releases are generally fairly stable, but are labeled beta because they haven't gone through the rigorous testing and bug fixing periods that a stable release must go through. But, plainblack.com and webgui.org are always running the latest beta releases before we release them. This helps us guage the stability of the release. We also provide hosting on both versions (though we don't recommend hosting on the beta unless you are an experienced WebGUI user and you know exactly what you're getting yourself into).

To be absolutely clear: You only need to care about the shunt release if you want to use the beta version. You will always have an upgrade path to go from 7.5 stable to 7.6 stable, once 7.6 stable becomes available.

I hope the combination of my text explanation, and the video will allow you to make an informed decision about whether you want to switch to 7.6 beta or not. And my dev team looks forward to your feedback about any bugs you find in the beta.

Replies

Flat
Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: ehab
Date: 10/9/2008 9:19 pm
Rating: 2    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved

I want these videos to feature JT not just the voice of JT.

 

Ehab Heikal

 www.elmotaheda.com , www.mashy.com

Quote: An eye for an Eye only helps make the whole world blind

Gandhi


Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: knowmad
Date: 10/9/2008 9:56 pm
Rating: 3    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved

Yes, I agree and have told JT as much. Having a personal presence is so much more powerful than a voice from the ether.

 

William

----
Knowmad Technologies
http://www.knowmad.com


Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: JT
Date: 10/9/2008 11:01 pm
Rating: 12    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved
I couldn't disagree more. The content is what is important. Not me, and certainly not my talking head ala 1960's newscaster. 

JT

On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:56 PM, <william@knowmad.com> wrote:

knowmad wrote:

Yes, I agree and have told JT as much. Having a personal presence is so much more powerful than a voice from the ether.

 

William

----
Knowmad Technologies
http://www.knowmad.com



http://www.plainblack.com/tbb/chat-with-jt-releases-and-stability/2


--

Plain Black&#44; makers of WebGUI
http://plainblack.com

Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: bartjol
Date: 10/10/2008 3:17 am
Rating: 5    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved

I agree with JT, allthough a small introductory video "The man behind the voice" would be nice. But for video's like this the content is more important.


Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: JT
Date: 10/10/2008 9:01 am
Rating: 11    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved
That I can do. But what would a prospective client want to know about me. Certainly this shouldn't be a dating site video where I share my hobbies and what I'm looking for in a love interest. So what exactly would I talk about?

JT

On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:17 AM, <bart@procolix.com> wrote:

bartjol wrote:

I agree with JT, allthough a small introductory video "The man behind the voice" would be nice. But for video's like this the content is more important.



http://www.plainblack.com/tbb/chat-with-jt-releases-and-stability/4


--

Plain Black&#44; makers of WebGUI
http://plainblack.com

Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: bartjol
Date: 10/10/2008 9:42 am
Rating: 7    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved

I was thinking a kind of interview, I haven't made up any questions yet, maybe something similar to the People behind WebGUI stuff.


Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: ehab
Date: 10/10/2008 11:16 am
Rating: 3    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved

 

Take a look at whiteboard videos at ZDnet, this model is what I was thinking of.

Easy to implement too.

 

http://news.zdnet.com/2435-13569-0.html

 

Ehab Heikal

 www.elmotaheda.com , www.mashy.com

Quote: An eye for an Eye only helps make the whole world blind

Gandhi


Re: Chat With JT: Releases and Stability
User: JT
Date: 10/10/2008 11:26 am
Rating: 6    Rate [

+

|

-

]
Status: Approved
There are several issues with that:

1) You couldn't read my hand writing.
2) I can't draw.
3) It takes at least 2 people to do that and at least 2 cameras.
4) Animations look better than white boards.
5) Just to get the audio right I usually do 10 takes or so, if I had  
to worry about video then it would take me a lot longer.

1:5 = not gonna happen

I appreciate your idea, and I want you to keep bringing feedback. But  
I'm not going to appear on camera unless it somehow enhances the  
content.

PreviousBackNext